Statements

Human Terrain System (HTS) Project

American Anthropological Association Executive Board Statement on the Human Terrain System Project

October 31, 2007

Preamble

Since early October, there has been extensive news media coverage of the U.S. military’s Human Terrain System (hereafter, HTS) project and of that project’s use of anthropologists.  Later this fall, the American Anthropological Association’s Ad Hoc Commission on the Engagement of Anthropology with U.S. National Security and Intelligence Communities will issue its final report. In advance of that report, the Executive Board affirms that it is important that judgments about relationships between anthropology, on the one hand, and military and state intelligence operations, on the other, be grounded in a careful and thorough investigation of their particulars.

The Commission’s work did not include systematic study of the HTS project. The Executive Board of the Association has, however, concluded that the HTS project raises sufficiently troubling and urgent ethical issues to warrant a statement from the Executive Board at this time.  Our statement is based on information in the public record, as well as on information and comments provided to the Executive Board by the Ad Hoc Commission and its members.

The AAA Executive Board’s Assessment of the HTS Project

The U.S. military’s HTS project places anthropologists, as contractors with the U.S. military, in settings of war, for the purpose of collecting cultural and social data for use by the U.S. military.  The ethical concerns raised by these activities include the following: 

1. As military contractors working in settings of war, HTS anthropologists work in situations where it will not always be possible for them to distinguish themselves from military personnel and identify themselves as anthropologists.  This places a significant constraint on their ability to fulfill their ethical responsibility as anthropologists to disclose who they are and what they are doing.  

2. HTS anthropologists are charged with responsibility for negotiating relations among a number of groups, including both local populations and the U.S. military units that employ them and in which they are embedded.  Consequently, HTS anthropologists may have responsibilities to their U.S. military units in war zones that conflict with their obligations to the persons they study or consult, specifically the obligation, stipulated in the AAA Code of Ethics, to do no harm to those they study (section III, A, 1).

3. HTS anthropologists work in a war zone under conditions that make it difficult for those they communicate with to give “informed consent” without coercion, or for this consent to be taken at face value or freely refused.  As a result, “voluntary informed consent” (as stipulated by the AAA Code of Ethics, section III, A, 4) is compromised.

4. As members of HTS teams, anthropologists provide information and counsel to U.S. military field commanders.  This poses a risk that information provided by HTS anthropologists could be used to make decisions about identifying and selecting specific populations as targets of U.S. military operations either in the short or long term.  Any such use of fieldwork-derived information would violate the stipulations in the AAA Code of Ethics that those studied not be harmed (section III A, 1). 

In addition to these four points about the activities of anthropologists working in the HTS project itself, the Executive Board has this additional concern:  

5. Because HTS identifies anthropology and anthropologists with U.S. military operations,  this identification—given the existing range of globally dispersed understandings of U.S. militarism—may create serious difficulties for, including grave risks to the personal safety of, many non-HTS anthropologists and the people they study.

Conclusion

In light of these points, the Executive Board of the American Anthropological Association concludes (i) that the HTS program creates conditions which are likely to place anthropologists in positions in which their work will be in violation of the AAA Code of Ethics and (ii) that its use of anthropologists poses a danger to both other anthropologists and persons other anthropologists study.

Thus the Executive Board expresses its disapproval of the HTS program.

In the context of a war that is widely recognized as a denial of human rights and based on faulty intelligence and undemocratic principles, the Executive Board sees the HTS project as a problematic application of anthropological expertise, most specifically on ethical grounds.  We have grave concerns about the involvement of anthropological knowledge and skill in the HTS project.  The Executive Board views the HTS project as an unacceptable application of anthropological expertise.

The Executive Board affirms that anthropology can and in fact is obliged to help improve U.S. government policies through the widest possible circulation of anthropological understanding in the public sphere, so as to contribute to a transparent and informed development and implementation of U.S. policy by robustly democratic processes of fact-finding, debate, dialogue, and deliberation.  It is in this way, the Executive Board affirms, that anthropology can legitimately and effectively help guide U.S. policy to serve the humane causes of global peace and social justice.


1995
1996
1997
1998
2004 Reports
2005
2005
2005 Reports
2006
2006
2006
2006 Reports
2008Reports
2009Reports
AAA Committees
AAA Guide
About AAA
ACC
Accessibility
Actions
Actions
Active Commissions and Task Forces
Agenda
AIDS Commission
Annual Business Meeting
Annual Meeting Program Committee
Annual Reports
Anthropology Education Committee
Anthropology News
AnthroSource
Archive
Archive
Association Operations Committee
Audit Committee
Awards
Awards Committee
Benefits
Blog
Bylaws
Calendar
Careers
Careers DVD
CEAUSSIC
Child Care
Climate Change Task Force
Coalition Partnerships
Commission on Governance
Committee for Human Rights
Committee on Gender Equity in Anthropology
Committee on Minority Issues in Anthropology
Committee on Public Policy
Committee on World Anthropologies
Committee/Commission
CoPAPIA
Departments
Donation
E-Advocacy
Elections
Ethics
Ethics Committee
Exhibitors
Fellowships
Field Schools
Finance Committee
For Media
For Practitioners
For Researchers
For Students
For Teachers
Governance & Organization
Help Information
History of AAA
Homepage
HomepageFEATURES
HomepageHIGHLIGHTS
HomepageNEWS
Information
Internships
Issues & News
Labor Relations Commission
Leadership
Legislative
Links
List
Long Range Plan
Long Range Planning Committee
Mailing Lists
Meeting Information
Meetings
Members in the News
Membership & Donations
Mission
Nominations Committee
On Race and Racism
Partners
PDFs
Placement Center
Policies
Policy Actions
Presenters & Attendees
Press Kit
Press Room
Prizes & Awards
Professional Development
Program & Abstracts
Public Policy/Advocacy
Publications
Resource Devlopment Committee
Resources
Resources on Race and Racism
Schedule
Section Reports
Sections & Interest Groups
Staff Directory
Statements
Surveys
Training Resources
Travel
Volunteers
Workshops
Workshops