| Table 2.1 Change of Surname | | | | |
| | | | | |
| American Indian | Asian | Spanish - Speaking | Black | |
| (N = 4) | (N = 9) | (N = 8) | (N = 16) | |
| Yes | 1 | | | 1 | |
| No | 1 | 9 | 8 | 15 | |
| Qual. | 2 | | | | |
| Table 2.2 Directory Listing, Sex and Age of Respondents and Non-Respondents | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| American Indian | Asian | Spanish - Speaking | Black | Total |
| Resp | Non-Resp | Resp | Non-Resp | Resp | Non-Resp | Resp | Non-Resp | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Female | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 10 | 8 | 32 |
| Male | 2 | 11 | 7 | 13 | 5 | 10 | 6 | 36 | 90 |
| Total | 4 | 13 | 9 | 17 | 8 | 11 | 16 | 44 | 122 |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Listed in a Professional Directory | | | | | | |
| Female | | | | | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| Male | | 4 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 14 | 35 |
| Avg Age | 39.3 | 48 | 40.3 | 44.9 | 38.8 | 45.3 | 34.7 | 53.9 | |
| Table 2.3 Highest Degree Attained, by Sex for Respondents and Non-Respondents |
| | | | | | | | | |
| American Indian | Asian | Spanish - Speaking | Black | Total |
| Resp | Non-Resp | Resp | Non-Resp | Resp | Non-Resp | Resp | Non-Resp | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| PhD Male | 2 | 7 | 6 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 19 | 63 |
| PhD Female | 1 | | 2 | | 3 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 19 |
| | | | | | | | | |
| MA Male | | 2 | 1 | | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 14 |
| MA Female | | 1 | 2 | | 2 | | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| | | | | | | | | |
| BA Male | | 1 | | | | | | 2 | 3 |
| | | | | | | | | |
| No Information | | | | | | | | |
| Male | | 1 | | 1 | | 1 | | 7 | 10 |
| Female | | | | 2 | | | | 4 | 6 |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Total | 4 | 13 | 9 | 17 | 8 | 11 | 16 | 44 | 122 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Table 2.4 Employment, by Sex for Respondents and Non-Respondents |
| | | | | | | | | |
| American Indian | Asian | Spanish - Speaking | Black | Total |
| Resp | Non-Resp | Resp | Non-Resp | Resp | Non-Resp | Resp | Non-Resp | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| University | | | | | | | | | |
| Male | 2 | 9 | 7 | 13 | 5 | 9 | 5 | 34 | 84 |
| Female | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 8 | 25 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Non-University | | | | | | | | | |
| Male | 1 | | | | | | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Female | 1 | | | 1 | | | 1 | | 3 |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Unemployed | | | | | | | | | |
| Female | | | 1 | | 1 | | | | 2 |
| | | | | | | | | |
| No Information | | | | | | | | |
| Male | 1 | | | | | 1 | | 1 | 3 |
| Female | | | | 2 | | | | | 2 |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Total | 4 | 13 | 9 | 17 | 8 | 11 | 16 | 44 | 122 |
| Table 2.5 Comparison of Ranked Departments Where Degree was Received |
| | | | | | | |
| | Department Granting Degree | | |
| | 1 - 10 | 11 - 20 | | |
| | | 3 | 1 | | |
| | 1 - 10 | 11% | 3.70% | | |
| Department | | | | | | | |
| Where | | 7 | 16 | | |
| Employed | 11 - 20 | 26% | 59.20% | | |
| | | | | | | |
This table places the 27 respondents to our questionnaire who have a PhD degree, and who work in a university, by rank of the department according to the Cartter Survey (see below).
(*Rankings of departments somewhat modified from A. M. Cartter, A Rating of Graduate Programs, 1971. American Council on Education, Washington, DC, p. 56.
| 1. Chicago | 17. Brandeis |
| |
| 2. UC-Berkeley | Colorado |
| |
| 3. Michigan | Indiana |
| |
| 4. Pennsylvania | Michigan State |
| |
| 5. Harvard | Minnesota |
| |
| 6. Yale | New Mexico |
| |
| 7. UC-Los Angeles | North Carolina |
| |
| 8. Columbia | Oregon |
| |
| 9. Cornell | Texas |
| |
| 10. Stanford | Tulane |
| |
| 11. Illinois | 18. SUNY-Buffalo |
| |
| 12. Arizona | Hawaii |
| |
| 13. Pittsburgh | NYU |
| |
| 14. Wisconsin | Rochester |
| |
| 15. Northwestern | Southern Illinois |
| |
| 16. Washington, Seattle | Washington-St. Louis |
| |
| | 19. Other |
| |
| 20. Foreign Institutions |
| Table 2.6 Comparison of Ranked Departments Where Degree was Received With |
| Place Employed for 75 PhDs [X2 = 6.06, p < .02 (1df)] |
| | | | | | | |
| | Department Granting Degree | | |
| | | 1 - 10 | 11 - 20 | | |
| | | 9 | 3 | | |
| | 1 - 10 | 12% | 4.00% | | |
| Department | | | | | | | |
| Where | | 26 | 37 | | |
| Employed | 11 - 20 | 35% | 49.30% | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| Table 2.7 Academic Mobility of 75 Minority PhDs: Respondents and Non- |
| Respondents [X2 = 2.30 Not significant, (.50 < p < .32, 2df)] |
| | | | | | |
| Respondents | Non-Respondents | Total | | | |
| Working in department | 7 | 6 | 13 | | | |
| ranked higher than | 25.90% | 12.50% | 17.30% | | | |
| place where PhD awarded | | | | | | |
| 5 | 9 | 14 | | | |
| Same department | 18.50% | 18.75% | 18.70% | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| Working in department | 15 | 33 | 48 | | | |
| ranked lower than place | 55.60% | 68.75% | 64% | | | |
| where PhD awarded | | | | | | |
| 27 | 48 | 75 | | | |
| Total | 100% | 100% | 100% | | | |
| | | | | | |