It
is mid-January as I write this, and many of us have
been anxiously watching events in Kenya. Balloting took
place on 27 December and went smoothly overall, despite
some immediate problems, such as polling stations in
Kibera (a large slum in Nairobi) opening several hours
late and with names missing from the registers.
Preliminary
polling had indicated that opposition leader Raila Odinga
of the Orange Democratic Movement (ODM) had a slight
lead over incumbent President Mwai Kibaki of the Party
for National Unity (PNU). Initial returns indicated
a still more significant lead, but the gap began to
close rapidly on 29 December. On 30 December, Samuel
Kivuitu, the Chairman of the Electoral Commission of
Kenya, declared that Kibaki had won the General Election.
After Kivuitu’s announcement, Kibaki was sworn
in during a notably quick and private ceremony at State
House. Immediately, protesters flooded the streets of
all major cities and many towns, with the resulting
violence a confusing mess of political protest, opportunistic
looting, and intentional targeting of people associated
with particular ethnic groups. International election
monitors, politicos, Kenyans and Kenya-philes from all
over the country and beyond vigorously debated the veracity
of the election results announced on 30 December. Amidst
all of the confusion, Kivuitu himself admitted that
he did not know whether Kibaki had actually won.
In the
three weeks following elections, at least 600 Kenyans
have been killed, 250,000 displaced, and countless more
have suffered from heightened insecurity. Issues of
insecurity preceded the election, of course, and are
symbolized by and rooted in incredible economic disparities
among Kenyan citizens. While the Kenyan economy experienced
a nearly 6% growth rate in 2007, half of Kenya’s
rapidly-growing population still lived below the poverty
line. Concerns about land tenure and employment opportunities
have plagued independent Kenya, and a series of corrupt
governments, land grabs, and questionable business practices
have only exacerbated the tension. This recent election,
then, served to ignite long-brewing frustrations. As
predicted, ethnic politicking resulted in ethnic violence
in many parts of the country.
Yet,
election day results for members of parliament (MPs)
have largely been accepted, marking a huge turnover.
Many incumbent MPs who were part of Kibaki’s PNU
and even cabinet lost their seats, as PNU secured only
33 of the 210 seats in the Kenyan Parliament, while
ODM attained 95 seats. Subsequently, ODM’s Kenneth
Marende was pronounced Speaker of the Tenth Parliament
in another tight contest, and shortly thereafter, another
ODM candidate, Farah Maalim, won the Deputy Speaker’s
position. Will the MPs be able to resolve some of the
crises of the state highlighted by the presidential
election? Perhaps they will have achieved something
toward this by the time this column is in print. If
so, it will have been none too soon. For, as I write,
the post-election violence in Kenya – already
dubbed “the Kenya syndrome” – has
already led to pre-election anxieties in other sub-Saharan
African states with pending elections. Zimbabwe is one
such state, and elections are scheduled for March….
The Kenya
Red Cross Society has issued an appeal to assist
a projected 500,000 people in the humanitarian crisis
in Kenya. To learn more and help them meet their goal,
please visit http://www.kenyaredcross.org/
For more
information on the situation in Kenya, see Kenya’s
daily newspapers, the Daily
Nation (http://www.nationmedia.com/dailynation/)
and The Standard
(http://www.eastandard.net/),
and watch NTV
Kenya at http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=NTVKenya.
See also Pambazuka
News (http://www.pambazuka.org/en/)
for additional critical commentary.
|